Court denies review of FMCSA fatigue policies

| January 30, 2014

A federal appeals court has dismissed the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association’s request for review of Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s enforcement policies regarding driver fatigue.

A District of Columbia three-judge panel denied the request regarding a letter OOIDA received from FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro. Ferro had written she declined to “repudiate” the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s out-of-service criteria for fatigue, which states OOS orders may be issued upon “reasonable, articulable suspicion.”

Related

Podcast: Safety, the best argument for more flexible sleeper splits

Also in this Voices special edition podcast, operator dispatches on the California Air Resources Board's Truck and Bus Rule, which officially goes into effect for ...

During oral arguments Jan. 14, OOIDA argued the FMCSA has previously authorized fatigue-based OOS orders only when drivers have been on the road for longer than permitted. Officials had improperly promulgated a legislative rule without notice and comment, OOIDA asserted.

However, the panel agreed with the FMCSA ‘s position that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the issue.

The challenged portion of the letter “merely reiterated the undisputed fact that state enforcement officials can issue out-of-service orders in response to certain regulatory violations,” they wrote. “The FMCSA is therefore correct when it notes that ‘sometimes a letter is just a letter.'”

More About:

OverdriveOnline.com strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions. Click here to read our comment policy.