President Obama has yet to respond to a request from House transportation leaders to withdraw the proposed hours-of-service rule.
Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica’s Sept. 23 letter to Obama asked that the proposal be withdrawn and for continuing the current rule. The Florida Republican wrote that the proposed rule would be an unnecessary and costly regulatory burden on truckers, given the improved record of truck safety since the 2008 rule became effective.
Three other Republican committee members signed the letter: Tennessee’s John Duncan, highway subcommittee chairman; Pennsylvania’s Bill Schuster, chairman of the railroads, pipelines and hazardous materials subcommittee; and Missouri’s Sam Graves, committee member and Small Business Committee chairman.
The president had not responded to their letter as of Sept. 28, according to Justin Harclerode, transportation committee communications director. Should the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration proceed with the new rule, the four House members would weigh options that could include hearings or legislation.
On Aug. 30, Obama responded to House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) request for pending regulations with compliance costs of more than $1 billion. Seven proposed rules qualified, including the HOS proposal at more than $1 billion and electronic on-board recorders at $2 billion.
Harclerode noted that soon after issuing that list, Obama withdrew the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ozone proposal, which would have been by far the costliest at $19 billion to $90 billion. On Jan. 26, the House transportation committee released its oversight and investigation plan, which included monitoring HOS developments.
The Owner-Operator Independent Driver Association and the American Trucking Associations have said the HOS proposal is costly and unnecessary since data indicate safety improvements under the current rule.
On Sept. 2, Dave Osiecki, an ATA senior vice president, wrote Cass Sunstein, administrator of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which is under the Office of Management and Budget. Osiecki said he was optimistic the proposed rule would not be made final. “If, however, it does not, its proposal will necessitate a very high level of scrutiny on the part of your office,” he wrote.
The FMCSA appears likely to publish an HOS final rule by its court-ordered Oct. 28 deadline. The agency sent the proposal to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Aug. 11. After LaHood finishes consideration of the proposal, the Office of Management and Budget will review it before publication.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia originally set the Federal Register publication deadline for July 26, which it later extended. In 2009, the FMCSA had entered into a settlement agreement with safety groups and the Teamsters union to revisit the current rule and publish a final rule. This agreement stipulates if the agency produces a “substantially different” rule from the current one, this “may” eliminate the need for further judicial review.