Readers: ‘No’ to truck size/weight increase

| April 22, 2014

Results from polling on OverdriveOnline.com show majority favor for the status quo on size and weight restrictions on the National Highway System. Polling followed news of Congressional attention with lobbying from outside groups on the size and weight issue as legislators craft a highway bill, as well as preceded a public webinar conducted by the Federal Highway Administration on truck size and weight regs.  

Related

Congress debates truck weight limits, freight movement in hearing

Increased truck weight limits — more efficient or more damaging? Or both? Those questions were the main focus of a House Transportation & Infrastructure panel ...

Gordon Alkire, commenting under the above poll on OverdriveOnline.com, called raising single-unit, nonpermitted legal weights or combination lengths a move that would benefit next to no one. “The increase to [the current limit of] 80,000 lbs. and longer trailers to 48 feet and then to 53 feet began to destroy our roads and bridges,” he said. “The increase in taxes and licenses did not go to the road fund but everywhere else. Now if the weight is increased, is the increase in tolls and licenses and registrations going to fund the additional repairs needed? Very doubtful.”  

Related

DOT to give truck size and weight increase update on May 6

FHWA will be holding an open-to-the-public webinar May 6 to provide an update on the MAP-21 required study on truck size and weight limits.

The only benefit, the owner-operator added, would go to fleets who could employ fewer drivers as a result. “Larger, heavier trucks will put some small carriers out of business,” and any benefit to trucking otherwise would be so small “it will be barely noticed.” 

At least one commenter made a case for the almost 3 in 10 respondents who did in fact favor some kind of an increase: “I pull a three-axle step deck, and with all the equipment I have to carry, I have a tare weight of 35,000 lbs.” A little extra weight would help the hauler out tremendously, he said. “I don’t dare load anything more than 44,000 lbs. Most shippers are looking at shipping 48-50,000 — this is what I need help on.”

What do you think? Weigh in in the comments here. 

While OverdriveOnline.com strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions, it does not welcome comments reflecting racism, vulgarity or spam. Violations of this policy can be grounds for removal of a comment or banning a user from the comments system.

  • Flat Rack Jack

    Leave it at 80000 it don’t benefit anybody but the customer they won’t pay anymore I see it all the time in the heavier states.

  • Canuck Truck

    I have to agree. I truck in Canada where our weight laws are higher, 39,000 on tandems. We don’t get paid more to haul it and our roads are getting beat from it. I look at the safety aspect of it. More chance of tire blowouts and 10,000 more pounds pushing you when brakes are demanded. Our weight laws are too heavy here. The only advantage is with a driver shortage it would be one answer to get more freight hauled with the same number of drivers. Doesn’t help the driver any though eh!

  • Zumba900

    There’s no shortage of drivers.
    Just a shortage of qualified people willing to put up with government, and industry, nonsense.
    Pay us properly, and fairly, for our skills and ALL of the hours that we work and then a premium after that, for having to miss out on a life at home because you’re out on the road.
    Voila! No more driver shortage.
    ;-)