MATS New Entrant listening session yields new ideas

| March 28, 2014
Responding to commentary from owner-operator Michael Totwin relative to the DataQs challenge process and citations for violations thrown out in court, Administrator Anne Ferro revealed that the agency's plan to downgrade such violations' weight in the CSA system could be in place as early as this summer.

Responding to commentary from owner-operator Michael Totwin relative to the DataQs challenge process and citations for violations thrown out in court, Administrator Anne Ferro revealed that the agency’s plan to downgrade such violations’ weight in the CSA system could be in place as early as this summer.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s second of three listening sessions dedicated to developing a knowledge test of for motor carrier, broker and freight-forwarder New Entrants got under way this morning in Louisville, Ky., at the Mid-America Trucking Show. Much of the commentary reflected prior Overdrive reporting on the subject, though some new ideas were aired. The New Entrant test FMCSA is crafting would put yet another step in the process of getting your own authority to run independently of another motor carrier. 

Dave OwenOwner-operator Michael Potwin expressed approval for the test, saying that “yes, we do need that. But we need testing so the little guy can get it” and urging the agency to keep the process simple. In such thoughts he echoed David Owen of the National Association of Small Trucking Companies, who offered some specific suggestions relative not only to the test but to how it could be administered. “One of our main considerations, and something that gets overlooked,” he said, is that “full-truckload long-haul carriers are all small-town rural-based people.”

FMCSA might make it easy on such constituencies by partnering with state and local DMVs and license-testing sites to administer the test. 


Readers debate New Entrant test

While a majority were positive about FMCSA's plan to introduce regs testing into the process for obtaining operating authority, questions as to the scope of ...

Two, Owen said, while he’s “big on keeping the costs down — don’t get it so fancy that it costs a lot of money – you could fund this by adding a fee to the applicant. When he applies for his authority, that fee could go directly to the testing site.” He suggest $100, potentially, though he wasn’t firm on that number and urged FMCSA to research hard costs. 

Third: Business education could be facilitated not as a matter of the test but as structured follow-on engagement, likewise via structured tutorials on the FMCSA website that tie questions to applicable regulations. 

Tom Weakley of the OOIDA Foundation

Tom Weakley of the OOIDA Foundation

To one extent or another, as was the case at the first New Entrant Listening Session, most commenters were in agreement that business best practices should not be a part of the questions that were required to pass — or fail, as it were — the test. Tom Weakley of the OOIDA Foundation, however, favored FMCSA making business best practices an official part of the testing — “a subsection of the test that includes an educational component,” he said — but one that didn’t contribute, necessarily, to test-takers’ pass/fail outcome. 

Weakley cited the Foundation’s work in its seminar and webinar series, which focuses on basic business practices as well as safety regulations. “We don’t think it should just be limited to FMCSA regs,” he said of the New Entrant knowledge test. “Best practices need to be considered – the more successful a person is, the less stress on that person and the safer that person is going to be.”

Online testing, Weakley added, combined with a robust system for verification of the identity of the test-taker, should be considered as an option. 

Commenter Dale Livengood felt the agency should develop different tests and potential educational curricula for different applications, citing his work with landscape and other companies in the 10,001-26,000-lb. category who, when they attend a social function and are asked what they do for a living, don’t answer that they work in transportation. “They say, ‘Well, I’m a landscaper.”

In different applications, he added, “the knowledge that they need is different.” 

The New Entrant Listening Session is ongoing through 3:30 p.m. EST in room C104 in the South Wing of at the Mid-America Trucking Show today. The next listening session will be conducted at the CVSA meeting April 7. 

  • jon

    when I had my new carrier entrance audit, it was obvious I know more than the DOT auditor that was doing my Audit. I had completed the paperwork that was needed and had a copy of the process to get my Authority in the FMCSA ETA manual which is a FREE download from their own website.

    This is a solution LOOKING For a problem. Government is not about HOW to run a business, that is our problem. Now you want to expand into managing HOW I operate my finances and books as well?

    FMCSA is already too oppressive for small business. Time to put you back in your place.

  • MillionsOfMiles

    Not surprised that OOIDA would shill for their own “pay-to-play” business acumen training (and make self-serving, unsubstantiated claims about how wonderful their seminars are). Trucking is too diverse for a one-size-fits all test on someones business knowledge and government should not involve itself it picking winners and losers. Focus on safety only and leave the rest to the market. It’s total BS to try and tie business savvy with being unsafe – where is the proof of that? There isn’t.

  • Stormy

    On my new entrant audit, I was “gigged” for not having the VIN# written on the outside of the maintenance record folder. I had it on the label, it was on each maintenance record and I had separate folders for each unit. But for safety’ sake it had to be written on the front of the folder. Does that sound like a safety issue or does it sound like they don’t like my filing system.

  • jesse wood

    stormy you were very unsafe for not having the vin# on the front of the envelope

  • Pingback: MATS News>> MATS New Entrant listening session yields new ideas #mats2014 | iTruckTV

  • g

    Those hillbillies trying to make sense talking to a woman and a negro who have never driven a truck?? lol…..what a comedy.

  • g

    Yes you could have caused a multi car pile up…..need some CSA points for that Blunder!

  • g

    OOIDA and ATA are both paper tigers…shills…puppets for the Rich. Those old fat slobs who “USED TO” drive truck a hundred years ago….taking bribes from anybody for anything….total joke.

  • g

    They need a Bracero on this panel of “experts”…lots of “truckers” only speekie Spanny…..

  • gregbo

    Once again FMCSA is imposing regulations way outside of their “satety” mandate. The business testing idea is simply another bar to entry for the benefit the mega carriers. If my business fails because I hit a school bus and kill a bunch of kids it’s there business. If my business fails because I don’t understand’s my business.

  • Supershell

    The driver they refer to as Michael Totwin in Michael Potwin

  • g

    Those old buzzards may as well save thar breath….talkin to uncaring paid off jack asses about yer occupational interests is just plain stupid. Those paid off jerks dont give a DAMN about anything a trucker has to say. They have an AGENDA all planned out by their SUPERIORS and a trucker is welcome to go crawl off and die. lol

  • Stormy

    I know and I took my demerits and scolding like the idiot that they know that I am. How can anybody not know the total disregard for safety I showed? I think I may headache more of a safety risk of getting a paper cut from the file folder. Hmm mm…. workers comp and maybe even disability.

  • papadave1973

    OOIDA. OLD OBNOXIOUS IGNORANT DUMB A&&ES. They are responsible for more oppression and care less about safety or anyone who doesnt pay their copper penny. strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions. Click here to read our comment policy.