Recent Comments

Appeals court vacates onboard recorder reg

| August 27, 2011

A federal appeals court on Aug. 26 vacated the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s electronic onboard recorder regulation for not addressing how the rule could prevent the devices from being used to harass drivers.

A three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that “the rule cannot stand because the agency failed to consider an issue that it was statutorily required to address.” The Truck and Bus Safety and Regulatory Reform Act of 1988 “requires the agency to ensure that any such device is not used to ‘harass vehicle operators.’ ”

A rule in 2010 mandated EOBRs for some carriers, while a rule passed this year required them for nearly every interstate carrier.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association appealed FMCSA’s April 5, 2010 rule last year. That regulation required EOBRs for all the trucks used by a carrier that has a greater than 10 percent rate of noncompliance with hours of service regulations in any single compliance review.

However, existing regs require EOBRs be used “to monitor safety, not workplace productivity.” Any future EOBR rule should contain “an adequate explanation that addresses the distinction between productivity and harassment (that) must also describe what precisely it is that will prevent harassment from occurring,” the court wrote.

The court disposed of the rule on “a narrow basis,” referring to the absence of a guard against harassment. It stated OOIDA had presented several arguments against the rule in February and noted “the briefing raises a litany of issues that would make for a difficult and exhaustive administrative law final exam.”

An FMCSA official said she is reviewing the court’s decision and that the agency “is committed to raising the bar for commercial truck and bus safety.”

New Advantage When Spec’ing a Cummins SmartAdvantage™ Powertrain

Notice: Overdrive is transitioning to a new comment platform due to technical problems with the former commenting system. The new commenting system is now live. We are currently in the process of moving all of the comments from the old system into the new system. We appreciate your patience in the meantime.


  1. […] The court decision, arrived at after a challenge put forward by individual owner-operators and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, held that FMCSA had not complied sufficiently with a requirement to be certain that the use of electronic logs would not be a means for carriers to harrass drivers, essentially. Here’s a little excerpt from Overdrive‘s Jill Dunn’s reporting of the news from Friday: […]

  2. […] the requirement of EOBRs for some hours-of-service-noncompliant carriers — last year and was vacated by a court earlier this year. You can read their task report from the last meeting, with committee recommendations following […]

  3. […] rule was vacated by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on grounds that, as OOIDA argued, the FMCSA had failed to consider the harassment of drivers as a […]