Group opposes rest area commercial services

| February 15, 2012

The Partnership to Save Highway Communities Feb. 14 urged members of Congress to oppose Amendment 217 of the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012, which it says would jeopardize thousands of businesses at exits along interstate highways.

Amendment 217, authored by Congressmen Steven LaTourette, Steve Stivers and Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, seeks to overturn the 50-year-old law prohibiting sale of food, fuel and convenience items at interstate rest areas. Instead it would allow states to use rest areas on interstates for nonhighway uses, including commercial activities.

The partnership says the amendment threatens nearly 97,000 small businesses operating within a quarter mile of interstates, endangering more than two million jobs.

“This amendment is the biggest threat small business owners have ever faced under a highway bill,” said Lisa Mullings, president and chief executive officer of NATSO, and a member of the partnership. “This highway bill was intended to create jobs, but if this amendment is allowed to pass, it will pull the rug out from under the nation’s interstate-based fast-food franchisees, convenience stores, gas stations and truckstops. Commercializing interstate rest areas would put exit-based businesses at a considerable disadvantage, likely forcing many out of business. This will have a substantial effect on local communities, increase unemployment, decrease local tax revenues and impede overall economic growth.”

The partnership referred to a recent study of commercial rest areas by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, which found that commercializing rest areas nationwide could cause a 46 percent decrease in sales at interstate-serving gas stations, a 44 percent decrease in sales at interstate-serving restaurants and a 35 percent decrease in truck service sales at interstate-serving truckstops.