LogBook

Overdrive Staff | May 01, 2012

As of April 5, Baja Express became the third carrier to receive authority. Like the second participant to receive authority, Moises Alvarez Perez, Baja also has one truck, one driver and has not traveled beyond the border zone.

Transportes Olympic, which has one truck and two drivers, has crossed 15 times since the program began more than five months ago.

Operating authority is pending for an additional 15 carriers, of which two have completed the Pre-Authorization Safety Audit required for participation. However, one of the two withdrew after the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association raised issues over its safety record.

OOIDA filed its final reply brief April 4 in its U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals lawsuit to stop the program. The court has said a similar lawsuit filed by the Teamsters, Public Citizen and Sierra Club will be argued on the same day before the same panel, but oral arguments have not been scheduled.

OOIDA says FMCSA lacks legal authority to accept Mexican carriers because they are not compliant with federal regulations. Mexico’s CDLs, medical certificates and drug testing standards do not meet American standards and therefore are non-complaint, it said in its reply.

FMCSA’s April 2 final brief asserts OOIDA’s members lack standing in the case because they are neither eligible for the program nor regulated by it and have not demonstrated proof of substantial harm.

Members would not be caused to lose business “because the vast majority of the cross-border deliveries are likely to be made in commercial zone,” the brief says, and because Mexican carriers are prohibited from making point-to point deliveries of domestic freight.

The Teamsters’ most recent case filing was its March 7 counter-arguments to the FMCSA’s stand that the pilot program does not include a representative sample of trucks domiciled in Mexico, as required by law.

— Jill Dunn

More About:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1269137418 Mike Jones

    What they mean is INSURANCE COMPANIES are telling us what to do…and Helping to Write these Rules because they dont want to Pay Out one more Penny than necessary for Anything they are involved in……A Truck Driver will NOT blink his eyes without being MONITORED..Observed…and a Data Sheet prepared on his activities……….BIG Money behind ALL these rules…..nice and fluffy to call it “safety concerns”.