OMB wraps up work on intermodal equipment rule

| June 06, 2012

The White House Office of Management and Budget has completed work on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s amended final rule concerning the inspection, repair and maintenance of intermodal equipment – specifically with respect to the requirement for drivers and motor carriers to prepare a driver-vehicle inspection report on an item of IME even if no damage, defects or deficiencies are discovered by, or reported to, the driver.

The issue initially was raised in a petition for rulemaking submitted on March 31, 2011, by the Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association and the Institute of International Container Lessors. The requirements for intermodal equipment providers to have in place inspection, repair and maintenance programs, and a process for receiving and taking appropriate action in response to DVIRs on which damage, defects or deficiencies are reported, remain in effect.

The final rule, effective Dec. 29, 2009, made intermodal equipment providers subject to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for the first time, and established shared safety responsibility among intermodal equipment providers, motor carriers and drivers. FMCSA said the new rule would enhance the safety of the nation’s intermodal transportation system by improving maintenance, which would result in fewer breakdowns and crashes involving intermodal chassis and fewer chassis being placed out of service.

Each IEP that offers intermodal equipment for transportation in interstate commerce was to file an Intermodal Equipment Provider Identification Report (Form MCS-150C) by Dec. 17, 2009. By completing and submitting Form MCS-150C, the IEP took the first step toward complying with the FMCSRs. After FMCSA received the completed MCS-150C Form, the IEP would be assigned a U.S. Department of Transportation number that serves as a unique identifier when collecting and monitoring a company’s safety information acquired during audits, compliance reviews, crash investigations and inspections. As an IEP, the company’s safety information would be acquired through roadability reviews, crash investigations and inspections.

On March 31, 2011, OCEMA and IICL submitted a joint petition to FMCSA requesting the repeal of the provision of the FMCSRs that requires motor carriers to prepare and transmit a DVIR to the IEP at the time the IME is returned to the IEP even when no damage, defects or deficiencies are noted, referred to as a “no-defect DVIR.” The petitioners contended that requiring the preparation and transmittal of these no-defect DVIRs imposes an undue burden on drivers, motor carriers, IEPs and intermodal facilities nationwide.

The petitioners estimated that a no-defect DVIR requirement would necessitate the completion, transmission, review and retention of more than 38 million unnecessary reports annually, and argued that the added administrative burdens of the requirement to file no-defect DVIRs actually could undermine the goal of safe IME.

The amended final rule could be published in the Federal Register at any time. To view the notice, go to; the docket number is FMCSA-2005-23315.

  • Jason Michaels

    This is such a rediculous article. I own a small fleet of trucks and all we pull are containers. At any time I could have one to five drivers sitting at CSX in Cleveland either waiting to flip a chasis which could take hours or sitting in the repair line waiting to get some type of repair and since there is only one repair line that also could take hours. None of the drivers want to go to that yard because we can go into Norfolk Southern and be out within 20 minutes. At NS the trailers are repaired and ready but at CSX they will use a red tag chasis and expect the driver to deal with it. I have written there corporate office in Jacksonville and sent photos of the lines and not a word from them. It is a terrible place and hard to keep drivers because of the wasted time. If you want to do a story send someone to the Cleveland Ohio yard for a week and see how bad it really is! strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions. Click here to read our comment policy.