Trucking far from ‘under-regulated’: Reactions to CNBC’s ‘Collision course’ series

| August 01, 2014

Reactions were swift in coming to the announcement of the Wednesday airing of a four-part special on the CNBC cable business-news network titled “Collision course,” which in part wonders at the lack of regulation of the “unsafe” trucking industry. As in other such mainstream industry coverage of late, statistics are presented in a manner that suggests every crash a truck is involved in is the fault of the truck driver.

And worse, as Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association spokesperson Norita Taylor pointed out in an association press release July 31, this and many other editorials and mainstream spotlights on the industry may even undermine “efforts to bring meaningful improvements to highway safety.”

“Our members believe the stories do more harm than good to public safety, and (they) want the motoring public to know that truck drivers log millions more accident-free miles than otherwise,” Taylor said. 

Likewise, as former American Trucker host Robb Mariani noted:

And in only around a fifth or a fourth of truck-involved accidents does the truck driver shares in fault, as has been established by a variety of studies. 

Related

Sharing the road: Some common sense on regulations to reduce crashes

From owner-operator Pete Zimmer: "Put the safety where needed. Educate auto drivers. Increase fines to make an impact. Put regulations where the biggest problems lie. ...

Mariani was echoed by owner-operator Pete Zimmer in the letter he wrote to Overdrive the same day, as the CNBC series went live. “Put the safety where needed,” Zimmer said, urging further education of auto drivers. “Increase fines to make an impact. Put regulations where the biggest problems lie. Make fines equal for all. We are all on the same highways.”

OOIDA’s Taylor agrees on the need for further education: “One primary area of safety efforts should be educating the motoring public about driving around trucks. There should be standardized training for new truck drivers as well.”

Related

Restart watch: Whoopi doesn’t get it either

"Attention mainstream media: There are a lot of people out here who think the changes that have been proposed in draft legislation may actually, on ...

Part of the Association’s Truckers for Safety.com effort is aimed at getting the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to finally develop Entry Level Driver Training standards for nationwide implementation, required by legislation but long put on the agency back burner. Otherwise, the Truckers for Safety campaign “looks at ways to improve highway safety without imposing burdensome regulations in a variety of areas,” OOIDA’s press release notes, a mission many readers would view as sensible, and directly counter to the fix described by sundry mainstream reports of late, further restrictions on hours and/or technological patches that plenty of safe truckers see as just another expense.

In many cases, as AsktheTrucker.com’s Allen Smith noted in the Overdrive’s Trucking Pro LinkedIn group, more regulations just create more problems with fatigue. His response to CNBC press emails on the series included this: “Shows omitting the causes [of driver fatigue] will not resolve the true problems of truck safety in this county. There are many issues going on within the trucking industry which relate to this. Increased regulations are causing more problems and fatigue.” 

Related

‘Perfect storm’ for driver issues afoot?

In the words of driver Allen Smith: "with all that has just happened in just the last 3 weeks, we have the momentum and leverage ...

The CNBC series itself wondered why there is not a “national outcry” for more regulations — though it may be wishful thinking, perhaps the public these reports are aimed at is more attuned to reality than the reports’ authors believe. As Dianne Vranesic put it quite simply, commenting on the CNBC report on Overdrive‘s Facebook page, “‘Under-regulated’? Are you kidding?”

Says OOIDA’s Taylor, “At a time when annual turnover is more than 100 percent, the effort should be to find ways to keep drivers in the industry and have new drivers view it as a career choice. It’s safer for everyone when drivers stay in the business rather than leaving and creating a void filled by new, inexperienced drivers.”

 

More reader reaction to the CNBC series:
Via Twitter
Richard Wilson @regguy69
: Again, all negativity by a biased mainstream media! Nothing truly discussed on improving crash causation!

Via Facebook
Lynn Pettus-Baker: Funny how they investigate us, but they never investigate the way four-wheelers drive on the road around us. Cutting us off, slamming on brakes in front of us, distracted while driving around us, etc. The list goes on and on…

Warren Wylds: Will they address the lack of flexibility, [which], not fatigue, is the cause of most collisions?

Bart Stevenson: Well, I don’t have to watch. Just by the [“Collision course”] title I know how this is probably going to end.

Lioubov Tchepiakova: Trucks guilty of everything!

0 comments

Trackbacks

  1. […] a lively discussion of driver reaction, visit this Voices page on the website of CCJ’s sister publication […]

  2. […] what Overdrive readers had to say and read Todd Dills’ Channel 19 blog on the […]

  3. […] bill into next year as it’s a hot potato to talk taxes during an election year. We have groups calling for stricter regulations because trucks are killers. Congress and the DOT still can not get the hours of service right as the fight still goes on over […]