Channel 19

Todd Dills

Language of MCSAC / Medical Review Board recommended apnea guidelines — more from D.C.

| February 06, 2012

Contrasting viewpoints coming together — or not — made for an interesting day today at the first of four days’ worth of meetings of the FMCSA’s Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee. Today’s agenda was dedicated to drafting language toward formal recommendation to the agency of potential guidance to adopt in future rulemaking relating to sleep apnea and drivers’ medical qualifications. For a roundup of what’s in the recommendations as issued and some of the debate that went on today between industry participants, medical reps and law enforcement, check out the news brief now live at OverdriveOnline.com.

Below you’ll find the language of the 10 recommendations, and I thought I’d also share here some statistics that the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has put together relative to the potential total cost of treatment of drivers under the 35 BMI testing mandate proposed. These costs are estimated at a $180 million total annual cost to the industry. That’s the testing alone. Granted, it assumes an average $2,500-$3,000 figure for an in-lab sleep test, which sleep specialists note has fallen somewhat in recent years. (However, in public comment near the end of the meeting yesterday, former small fleet owner — and current school bus fleet owner — Donald Fowler, of Richmond, Mo., referenced an October sleep study he himself had that was billed, all told, at just shy of $2,000.)

Furthermore, in a member survey OOIDA conducted, 72 percent of operators said their medical policies would not cover sleep apnea expenses. An argument OOIDA’s Todd Spencer and others made today, too, demonstrated something of a safety net loss if a large number of experienced operators are in fact forced out of the industry by the regulation (the OOIDA stats estimate 12 percent of the 3.5 million or more CDL drivers have BMI above or equal to 35) and are replaced by a less-experienced group, naturally more prone to making on-highway mistakes.

That’s all of course not counting the time and miles lost to downtime during testing, which for some operators could be significant if their apnea problems turn out to be significant themselves — some operators concluded to have apnea would be disqualified until treated. See below for specifics.

Another interesting part of the proceedings was the fact the final recommendations from the subcommittee on acceptable areas of treatment put the most confidence in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines, not least due to the ease of monitoring that is in place in current devices. This came in spite of dental practices in existence today that specialize in sleep medicine, as some of you I know are already well aware of. Midwest Dental Sleep Center’s Scott Craig, of Woodridge, Ill., characterized the exclusion of dental treatment of apnea in the recommendations as a mistake that is the result of the lack of a dental specialist on the FMCSA’s Medical Review Board. “Currently there are commercially available products to monitor compliance,” he said, showing me the Smart Retainer device by Scientific Compliance as an example.

The manufacturer inserts electronic temperature sensors into dental retainers in order to allow doctors to scan the device to retrieve information about use and other data.

MRB members effectively dismissed much of the literature on studies relating to dental appliances as non-objective, borderline “commercials,” one said.

MCSAC member and Texas-based Clark Freight Lines’ Danny Schnautz put in his objection to the exclusion of the devices. Schnautz could well see such devices’ potential attraction to drivers who might otherwise need to idle their trucks to ensure power to a CPAP machine and truck starting power overnight. “I think we might be shutting the door tighter than we should have,” he said, making reference to language in the MCSAC recommendations that state dental devices’ “long-term efficacy” cannot “be demonstrated currently, so these technologies are unapproved alternatives at this time.”

Full language of the recommendations as I best followed their drafting/revision follows. (Note: there may be further revision as yet before they are sent formally to FMCSA, though their intention as outlined here should largely remain. Italics represent committee annotations about intentions.)

RECOMMENDATION LANGUAGE:
Recommendation 1 — General

  • Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis precludes unconditional certification.
  • A driver with OSA diagnosis can be certified if:
    • The driver has untreated OSA with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 20 (i.e., mild-to-moderate OSA) AND
    • The driver does not admit to experiencing sleepiness during the major wake period OR
    • OSA is being effectively treated.

A driver with an OSA diagnosis may be recertified annually, based on demonstrating compliance with therapy.

  • Minimally acceptable compliance with PAP means at least 4 hours/day of use 70 percent of days.
    • § Drivers should be encouraged that more hours of PAP use is preferable.
    • § Optimal treatment efficacy occurs with 7 hours or more of daily use during sleep.

  • The intent behind the AHI threshold is to prioritize those drivers with OSA that need immediate treatment.
    • Drivers with mild OSA (AHI levels as low as 5) may benefit from OSA treatment, and should be encouraged to explore treatment options.
    • Drivers with an AHI between 5 and 20 should be encouraged to seek treatment, if they have a history involving a fatigue-related crash or a DOT-defined single vehicle crash [footnote reference: crash involving a CMV that results in a fatality or injury treatable away from the scene or disabling damage requiring tow away], or if they report sleepiness while operating a motor vehicle.
  • Why set the AHI threshold at 20?
    • Crash risk in the moderate-to-severe OSA range is statistically higher than for drivers with mild OSA.

From a practical perspective, setting the AHI limit at 15 or above makes it more difficult to get a patient under treatment to that AHI level. Although AHI of 15 is likely a safer threshold, there is not data to show this.

 

RECOMMENDATION 2 — Drivers with any of the following should be disqualified immediately or denied certification: 

  • Report excessive sleepiness during the major wake period while driving, OR
  • Experienced a crash associated with falling asleep, OR
  • Have been found non-compliant in treatment per Recommendation 1.

 

RECOMMENDATION 3 — Drivers with any of the following may be granted conditional certification per Recommendation 4:

  • Have AHI > 20 until compliant with PAP, OR
  • Have undergone surgery and are pending post-op findings per Recommendations 10-12, OR
  • Have a BMI > or equal to 35 kg/m2 (pending sleep study).

Notes:

  • BMI cutoff of 33 is supported by studies (MRB).
  • BMI cutoff should be objectively related to crash risk (Conway).

 

RECOMMENDATION 4 — Conditional certification

  • Driver with BMI > or equal to 35 kg/m2 may be certified for 60 days pending sleep study and treatment (if diagnosed with OSA).
  • Within 60 days, if a driver being treated with OSA is compliant with treatment (per Recommendations 8-12), the driver may receive additional 90 day conditional certification.
  • After 90 days, if the driver is still compliant with treatment, the driver may be certified for no more than 1 year.  Future certification dependent on continued compliance.

Refer to Recommendation 1 for definition of minimal compliance. [Insert clinical evaluation educational footnote]

 

[CLINICAL EVALUATION EDUCATION FOOTNOTE]

  • Medical examiners should screen all drivers for OSA.
  • The driver is judged at-risk for OSA based on:
  • The driver’s answers to a validated questionnaire (e.g., Berlin), OR *Some other validated screening tool.
  • Symptoms:  loud snoring, witnessed apneas, sleepiness during major wake period.
  • Risk factors may include the following. A single risk factor alone may not infer risk. Need to look at multiple factors.
  • Factors contributing to high risk
  1. Small or recessed jaw
  2. Neck size > 17” male, 15.5” female (strongly correlated with obesity, which is associated with sleep apnea)
  • Other factors
  1. Age 42 and aove
  2. BMI > 28 kg/m2
  3. Small airway (Mallampati Scale score of Class 3 or 4)
  4. Family history
  5. Male or post-menopausal female
  6. Experienced a single-vehicle crash
  • Conditions associated with high risk:
  1. Hypertension (treated or untreated)
  2. Type 2 diabetes (treated or untreated)
  3. Hypothyroidism (untreated)

 

RECOMMENDATION 5 — Method of diagnosis and severity

  • Methods of diagnosis include in-laboratory polysomnography, at-home polysomnography OR a FDA-approved limited channel ambulatory testing device which ensures chain of custody.
  • In-laboratory polysomnography, which is more comprehensive, should be considered when the clinician suspects a sleep disorder in addition to sleep apnea.
  • Note that new technologies will likely emerge that will be able to screen for OSA.
  • Driver should be tested while on usual chronic medications.
  • Note that the joint medical committee did not consider AHI levels from unattended studies, but only in-lab sleep studies, which detect the arousal component of hypopneas (not just saturation).
  • An in-home sleep study may underestimate AHI when compared to an in-lab sleep study.
  • An AHI detected on an in-home sleep study may be less than an in-lab study because the in-home study likely does not consider total sleep time.
  • Therefore, the medical examiner should use clinical judgment when interpreting results of an unattended sleep study.
  • If the clinician believes the level of apnea is greater than the level reported by the in-home study, the clinician should consider recommending an in-laboratory sleep study.

 

RECOMMENDATION 6 — Treatment, PAP

  • All individuals with OSA should be referred to a clinician with relevant expertise.
  • PAP is the preferred OSA therapy.
  • Adequate PAP pressure should be established through one of the following:
    • Titration study with polysomnography
    • Auto-titration system

A driver who has been disqualified may be conditionally certified (per Recommendation 4) if successfully treated for 1 week AND

  • The driver can demonstrate at least minimal compliance (4 hrs/use 70% of nights) AND
  • The driver does not report excessive sleepiness during major wake period.

 

RECOMMENDATION 7 — Treatment alternatives

There are limited data regarding compliance with and the long-term efficacy of dental appliances cannot be demonstrated currently, so these technologies are unapproved alternatives at this time.

Surgical treatment is acceptable (see Recommendations 10, 11 and 12).

 

RECOMMENDATION 8 — Bariatric surgery

After bariatric surgery, a driver may be certified if:

  • Compliant with PAP, OR 6 months have passed since surgery (for weight loss), AND
  • Cleared by treating physician, AND
  • No reported excessive sleepiness during major wake period.
  • After six months have passed since surgery, a repeat sleep study may be considered to evaluate for the presence of ongoing sleep apnea.

Annual recertification

  • Maintain stable weight

If clinically indicated, repeat sleep study.

 

RECOMMENDATION 9 — Oropharyngeal surgery, facial bone surgery

After oropharyngeal or facial bone surgery, a driver may be certified if:

  • 1 month has passed since surgery, AND
  • Cleared by treating physician, AND
  • No reported excessive sleepiness during major wake period.

After 1 month has passed since surgery, if the apnea appears to have resolved, a repeat sleep study should be considered to test for the presence of ongoing sleep apnea.

Annual recertification

  • If clinically indicated, repeat sleep study.

 

RECOMMENDATION 10 — Tracheostomy

After tracheostomy, a driver may be certified if:

  • 1 month has passed since surgery, AND
  • Cleared by treating physician, AND
  • No reported excessive sleepiness during major wake period.

After 1 month has passed since surgery, if the apnea appears to have resolved, a repeat sleep study should be considered to test for the presence of ongoing sleep apnea.

Annual recertification

  • If clinically indicated, repeat sleep study.
  • David Imschweiler

    I have been using a cpap machine for about eight years and love it. I get a great nights sleep and in the interest of safety this is a bug on a bumper to do. Plus those drivers who have it once treated will feel fantastic it is great not being tired during the day!

  • Don Lanier

    David,
    But what about drivers who dont have the symptoms, show no drowsiness or have no issues with sleep, and are forced to use the machine and have more issues sleeping with it. Thats the class I fall in, It may help some people but I tried to use the machine for a full 2 months, and after that I had red eyes, poor sleep, and it kept me constantly worried about compliance. I think someones not leaving an out for drivers who have no symptoms, but the sleep centers say Oh you do have this ??? Ive been trying to comply and losing sleep with a vacuum blower strapped to my face. There needs to be alternative treatment besides Bariatric Surgery, and Surgery that costs thousands when I have no Health Insurance.
    Drivers are gonna be run out of trucking by this STATISTIC and Testing that no one understands but the Sleep scientist and his Algorythms…

  • Pingback: Twitter and FaceBook Provide Live Coverage of FMCSA Meetings to Truckers | AskTheTrucker

  • Pingback: Editor to discuss recorders, sleep apnea | Overdrive - Owner Operators Trucking Magazine

  • Pingback: Editor to discuss recorders, sleep apnea | Truckers News | Trucking News, Health & Lifestyle

  • Pingback: Twitter and FaceBook Provide Live Coverage of FMCSA Meetings to Truckers | Choice Transport

  • Pingback: More than a typo? Split sleeper wishful thinking | Overdrive - Owner Operators Trucking Magazine

  • Pingback: Twitter and FaceBook Provide Live Coverage of FMCSA Meetings to Truckers | Charles Hanlon

  • Pingback: Sleep apnea reg recommendations: Comments closed? | Overdrive - Owner Operators Trucking Magazine

  • Pingback: $100 off apnea test; Motorhead Garage TV at Diamond International | Overdrive - Owner Operators Trucking Magazine

  • Pingback: Sleep Apnea Tests & EOBRS: Drivers & Fleet Owners « COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS

  • oilman29

    Why cant we have just one rule, be careful and drive as safely as possible. Done.

  • MercenaryMan

    Frankly this LANGUAGE will elimante more then half of the older fatter and well paid drivers once its made into law, anybody who thinks its about DRIVER SAFETY is a fool. Notice that youll be FORCED to pay for numerous sleep studys and you can be sure the INHOME or reasonable cost testing will soon be not good enough, youll pay and pay and pay, and once your on it, you wont use it for a few months it will be part of your life FOREVER with the ongoing costs paid by YOU THE DRIVER.

    This has got PROFITS AND its easy to see whose going to profit, the sleep industry suddenly is the all knowing caring safety industry, why is it for nearly 70 years weve had millions of drivers behind the wheel in trucks, and a very small percentage suffered from really being tired, most of these men and women did this job perfectly and kept there truck and freight safe.

    So when do they start testing all shift workers, you can bet soon that will start and on and on, once these Do gooders get there hands in the pocket book and you can bet the see a GOLDMINE COMING….

    Brothers and Sisters if you dont stand up and tell these folks what you think of this , anyone 42 and above can expect to be out of a job, if your belts an XLarge your gone too, and if you have that BMI of 35 and over youll be wearing and using a blow dryer on your face to sleep as long as you hold a CDL….

    I was about to buy a brand new truck, I wanted to drive ten years and retire, thats not gonna happen now, I see the writing on the wall and it doesnt look good for me, my driving record is spotless, CSA score is Perfect, never had an accident and that should be what Im judged on not my Belt size….Stigmatizing anyone whose what they deem overweight, unhealthy and dangerous…..HOGWASH

  • MercenaryMan

    If clinically indicated, repeat sleep study. 2000.00 dollars paid by YOU, and after 1 year, If clinically indicated repeat sleep study, 2000.00 dollars paid by you, Machine rentals, Doctors visits, If clinically indicated repeat sleep study…2000.00, money you cant spend on a car, home, college or kids..BUT WHOSE GETTING RICH !!!!

  • guest

    That is the crazyest thing I have ever seen….that crazy “Mask”….out of a Horror Movie……Frankensteins Lab…I wont be attending THAT B.S. I can assure you…..a “sleep lab”..way too weird…..this crap is for astonauts…..be sensible..Bus Drivers are next??? Maybe Cabbies??

  • guest

    Totally INSANE..the whole thing…

  • guest

    Sure…come into the Lab…Do as the “sleep Scientist” tells you to do…..now disrobe for us…….ahahahaha lol
    Not Me Weidos……..I aint goin anywhere near your
    Weirdo “LAB”………what a sick joke.

  • guest

    While you are asleep they install a Monitoring Chip up your Butt…..what an insane bunch of crap….boy that Singer was RIGHT…..If You Dont Make A Stand..you will fall for anything..the old time truckers would be laughing their heads off at all this CRAP!!!!

  • HywayHero

    Read an artical about this some time ago. The author hinted that the makers the cpap machines and the doctors who do the testing are the ones pushing to impliment this rule. Bet you last dollar its not so much abourt safety as it is about them making more money.

  • johnny dark

    i just hope that they don’t find out that one of my legs is shorter than the other two. while not debilitating it may make me unfit for service

  • shane

    Drivers shouldn’t be screened as at-risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by belt size (BMI)! My BMI is considered well within the healthy range. I’m 6 ft, 190 lbs, 33-in waist … but … I have SEVERE OSA! Using BMI would not have flagged me for OSA …

  • shane

    Drivers shouldn’t be screened as at-risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by belt size (BMI)! My BMI is considered well within the healthy range. I’m 6 ft, 190 lbs, 33-in waist … but … I have SEVERE OSA! The BMI criteria would not flag me …

OverdriveOnline.com strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions. Click here to read our comment policy.