Senate transportation leaders push for long-term highway bill, maintaining spending levels

| April 11, 2014
Boxer-press-conference
From left to right: Sen. Tom Carper, Sen. David Vitter, Sen. Barbara Boxer, Sen. John Barraso 

Key transportation leaders in the U.S. Senate have agreed to several priorities for the next highway bill, with the two key elements being passing a longer-term bill and maintaining current highway spending levels. 

Related

Sorting through highway funding plans: Several irons in the fire

With Highway Trust Fund bankruptcy and the expiration of the MAP-21 act looming, here's a look at some of the key proposals so far to ...

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, along with committee ranking members Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) and Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wy.) and Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee chair Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), held a press conference April 10 to say they had reached an agreement “in principle” on the next highway reauthorization bill. 

The conundrum of how to pay for it, though, will be left to others. That matter, however, is pressing, as the Highway Trust Fund is expected to run dry this summer, as early as July. The current MAP-21 highway funding act expires Sept. 30.

Boxer et al. said their priorities with the bill are: 

  • Passing a long-term bill, as opposed to “a short-term patch;”
  • Maintaining the formulas for existing core programs;
  • Promoting fiscal responsibility by keeping current levels of funding, plus inflation;
  • Focusing on policies that expand opportunities for rural areas;
  • Continuing our efforts to leverage local resources to accelerate the construction of transportation projects, create jobs, and spur economic growth; and
  • Requiring better information sharing regarding federal grants

“The reason the four of us are standing here is to send a strong signal to this country that we, as leaders of this committee, have worked across party lines to act before the Highway Trust Fund cannot pay its bills,” Boxer said. “For those of you who follow this issue, you know that the Highway Trust Fund is expected to run out of money later this summer, which would be devastating to thousands of businesses and millions of workers across the country.”

Related

Shoring up U.S. Highway Trust Fund critical for global competitiveness, DOT head says

Finding a solution to stabilizing the U.S.' Highway Trust Fund is not only critical to saving jobs but actually saves the country money in the ...

Vitter said the legislation is nonpartisan and pushed for the Senate Commerce and Banking committees to develop a long-term highway funding plan quickly. 

“Having a good robust highway infrastructure is a key part of the backbone of the economy, and we all support doing that in a responsible, open and transparent way,” he said. “And the detailed outline of transportation policy that we have developed that’s being turned into legislative language now does just that.”

Click here to read prior OD coverage about the proposals so far for how to fund the highway bill, which include fuel tax increases, corporate tax reform, vehicle mileage tax and more.

While OverdriveOnline.com strives to maintain an open forum for reader opinions, it does not welcome comments reflecting racism, vulgarity or spam. Violations of this policy can be grounds for removal of a comment or banning a user from the comments system.

  • Pingback: Senate transportation leaders push for long-term highway bill, maintaining spending levels | iTruckTV

  • vrahnos

    Well get ready to pay more in taxes.That is their usall fix to the problems.Throw more money at it.The biggest thing they need to do is cap the labor costs of construction and mantinance too.We don’t need more hwys.just better repair mostly.We have an hwy.that is known as the hwy.of never endiong construction.It is I 405 and is only about 30 miles long and is a bypass route for I 5 through Seattle.So the state and federal government spend as much money on I 405 as on all the other roads and high ways in the State of Washington.That is a nice peice of government waste.

  • Jay

    To run at 105, 500 I pay an extra $400 in regestration fees, $500 in permits, tires wear out fast, .the list goes on and on, easier said than done. These people only Look at what’s on paper, not what’s really going on with those of us who actually do these heavier loads.

  • Pingback: Senate committee for highway funding » Hiring Pro Drivers